Contract review and drafting
Send over a contract the way you would send it to a lawyer. You get back what to fix, the exact language to send instead, and a straight answer on whether to sign it. When you need a document rather than a review, ask for that instead.
A 22 page vendor MSA. Fifteen standard categories assessed or flagged unchecked, two things worth stopping for, and language you can paste straight into the redline.
Nine more categories came back clean.
Section 9.1
Fix before signing
Liability is uncapped for any breach and the carve outs only run one way. On a contract this size that is unbounded exposure for an ordinary service failure.
Send this instead
Aggregate liability under this Agreement shall not exceed the fees paid by Customer in the twelve (12) months preceding the claim, excluding liability for gross negligence or willful misconduct.
This is the one to fix first. In the deals we have seen it is also among the terms vendors are most willing to move on.
PDF, Word, or a scan of a scan. In the web chat. No form to fill in and no implementation call.
Every material clause is read against a fifteen point checklist and against the positions you have taken before. From Growth up you can put a second and third model over the same document and see where they disagree.
A marked up document, the issues in the order worth fighting them, and a draft reply to the other side that reads like you wrote it.
Renewal windows, notice periods, and what you promised to do. You hear about them with time to act, not after.
Every review reads the whole document against a fifteen point checklist and against the positions you have already taken. From Growth up, on a document worth a second opinion, you can run two more models over it and we show you exactly where they disagree, because disagreement is usually a sign the paper is genuinely ambiguous.
What you can actually get, not just what is wrong. Which two terms the other side will concede if you ask once.
How this paper compares to the deals you already signed, so you stop agreeing to terms that contradict each other.
Line by line, including the cross reference on page 31 that quietly changes the liability cap on page 9.
Every review you have run and every position you have taken, so the answer argues from your standards rather than generic ones.
Half the time you are not reviewing someone else's paper, you need a document of your own. Ask for it in the same place and you get a first draft built from the positions you have already taken, not a template off the internet.
It comes back marked up where you have a decision to make, so you can see what you are agreeing to before you send it out.
A mutual NDA with a contractor, two years, our standard carve outs.
The caps, notice periods and indemnity language you have used before come through by default.
Editable, ready to send, with the open decisions flagged where they sit.
Every plan covers both reviewing the paper you were sent and drafting the documents you need. Anyone in the workspace can use it, so you are not buying a licence for each person who touches a contract.
Four reviews a month
Fifteen reviews a month
Forty reviews a month
A hundred reviews a month
Volume set with you
We use model provider tiers that are contractually zero retention, so contract text is not stored on their side. On paid plans, no shared model is trained on anything you upload.
At rest and in transit, with each workspace isolated from every other one.
Along with single sign on and custom retention on Enterprise. We will say when it lands rather than before.
Esquires is not a law firm, so what you send is not covered by attorney client privilege. It is confidential: your documents stay inside your workspace and are never shared. On paid plans they are never used for training.
Making an account is free. A review is $89 for one contract, or it comes out of your monthly plan.
Review a contract